![]() Moreover, its viability blankets over all of the relevant playstyles in the meta (Yes, zyg can fit stall, fite me). It's weaknesses are rather easy to cover up with decent teaming and it gets one of the most broken pair of moves in the game. This set makes many of the previously viable switch ins to zyg irrelevant, as well as being one of the most relevant setup sweepers in the meta because of the amount of hits zygarde can take. You could slap on dragonium z for the extra power and the gira OHKO (plus the outrage-free turn), but missing out on xern OHKO is a bit ehh. It has three sets which are all capable of being solid setup sweepers (Coil glare, DD T arrows-t waves and DD outrage), and before you shit on me for mentioning dd outrage, +1 z move thousand arrows ohkos e killers, standard xern, standard p don, p ogre and close to everything uninvested and grounded. ![]() Okay, I can't say much about Zygarde's viability that hasn't already been said. Why is there a spot for "Primal Pokemon?" There isn't a to use up like there is for megas. Mluk isn't an arceus check, unless this is wallceus as well? (if so, there should be a whole bunch more answers) Pyukumuku to Xerneas checks? It checks after boosting, but not before, so idk. Resources are for mons u know are good, not stuff you slap on and pray work.ĭarkceus to Yveltal checks, Klefki and Nihelego out (I think we discussed why) As a start, I would think that you would remove scarf (rlly bad) and specs (mediocre on MRay, much less here). I'm sure it has a niche, but it's almost certainly not a usable specs, LO, Dragon Dance, Band, and Scarf user. Remove Regular Rayquaza from a bunch of things. It's not a meme, I swear it forces out Mega Gengar really reliably, can KO it with pursuit, and if you're a baller can switch in with Sash while Gengar mega evolves. The Pokemon in the sub-ranks are fully ordered in alphabetical order.ĭeoxys-Attack to pursuit. If your opponent has a Choice Specs Ho-Oh, this is a clear indication that this is not the case. ![]() Thirdly, ensure any replays provided are against skilled opponents with actual teams. Nothing makes your argument seem more invalid than when you begin to insult another user instead of actually debating the topic at hand. Secondly, be civil when debating with other users. Providing replays and usage stats are excellent ways to display your nominated Pokémon in action although, this is not required and should not be the basis of your argument. You are encouraged to post thoughts on where each Pokémon should be ranked however, there are a few regulations we follow:įirstly, nominations without context or supporting evidence will be ignored. The concept of this thread is that we will organize the Pokémon in this metagame into ranks, varying on how good they are. Welcome to the official Anything Goes Viability Rankings.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |